On his podcast, Jim Ross shared his thoughts on fans thinking Seth Rollins cannot believably defeat reigning Universal Champion Brock Lesnar for his title.
Ross argued that Rollins is not too small to defeat Lesnar, as the late great Eddie Guerrero was even smaller than Rollins and was able to put on a memorable performance.
“Eddie Guerrero beat Brock Lesnar to win the WWE title in the Cow Palace, right? 15 years ago. So when people say, ‘well, so-and-so, Finn Bálor, is not big enough to beat Brock Lesnar. It’s not realistic. It’s not believable.’ Are you kidding? Are you that stupid? Same thing with Seth Rollins. He’s no giant, but he’s a hell of a lot bigger than Eddie Guerrero, he’s bigger than Finn Bálor, so I hope we don’t get that excuse, ‘Seth Rollins is too small.’ He’s not. And there [are] a million right ways to beat Brock Lesnar.” Ross continued, “Brock Lesnar has a lot more respect for his income than his win/loss record. Trust me on that. So I wonder if Lesnar taking Eddie Guerrero for granted in the Cow Palace 15 years ago to lose the WWE title will have any bearing on how he prepares for a smaller guy. Interesting sidebar story, don’t you think?”
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
LATEST NEWS var numposts = 7;var showpostthumbnails = true;var displaymore = false;var displayseparator = true;var showcommentnum = false;var showpostdate = false;var showpostsummary = true;var numchars = 100;
